Casey Luskin did a good podcast explaining a problem with two kinds of evidence commonly used to argue for common ancestry.
On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin takes a keen-eyed look at Darwin’s tree of life and finds that common descent, far from being confirmed by the data, is actually contradicted by it, as New Scientist pointed out in their cover story, “Why Darwin was wrong about the tree of life.”
Listen in to learn how the data is challenging Darwinist assumptions, and check out “A Primer on the Tree of Life” for more information.
The paper linked above seems to be exactly what he read out loud in the podcast.
Here is one section from the paper that summarizes everything:
One authoritative review paper by Darwinian leaders in this field stated, “As morphologists with high hopes of…
View original post 130 more words