(by Bruce Malone, used with permission)
Believers in evolution claim that the fossil record is filled with transitional forms of life that prove one form of life turned into another over vast periods of time. Those who acknowledge the evidence that we have an intelligent designer claim that there are no transitional fossils showing how one animal turned into another. Both groups have the same rocks, fossils, and data, so why do they come to such different conclusions? And how can the non-scientist know who is correct?
View original post 591 more words